tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post347655627475063877..comments2024-02-10T18:19:36.406-08:00Comments on Newspaper Rock: Changing "Redskins" wouldn't cost anythingRobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01478763837213733775noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-57932783531314671402013-05-18T08:46:12.761-07:002013-05-18T08:46:12.761-07:00Of course it would cost a lot initially. But the ...Of course it would cost a lot initially. But the study says new revenues would offset the costs within a couple years. Net cost: zero.Robhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01478763837213733775noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-57819647807904542342013-05-17T10:09:44.219-07:002013-05-17T10:09:44.219-07:00I'm sure it would cost a ton: there are a lot ...I'm sure it would cost a ton: there are a lot of costs ANY time an organization, team, or business, changes the logo. Starting with the cost of new logos, changing letterhead, and the rest.<br /><br />However, it is not prohibitive. Not in the least. Many teams in the NFL and other major franchises have changed their names for various reasons, some having to do with moving, and some not. Washington Wizards, for one. In other words, it happens all the time. And the teams survive.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.com