tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post7708029942873668959..comments2024-02-10T18:19:36.406-08:00Comments on Newspaper Rock: Native woman shills for PebbleRobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01478763837213733775noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-45192726550382363162011-08-19T09:19:22.897-07:002011-08-19T09:19:22.897-07:00I attempt again to figure out Anon's poorly th...I attempt again to figure out Anon's poorly thought out and poorly worded point. <br /><br />Thomas, in his "Lynching" comment, was referring to the efforts against him by mostly white people in Congress, as opposed to efforts by Anita Hill.<br /><br />His comments were ill chosen, but not any more racist as when leftist black politicians make false claims racial persecution (such as <a href="http://www.examiner.com/populist-in-national/tea-party-protesters-shout-nigger-and-spit-on-lawmaker" rel="nofollow">this claim</a>, which turned out to be a hoax). Both are destructive, as they muddy the waters when there is concern over actual incidents of racism.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-38662085872743373062011-08-18T15:50:12.363-07:002011-08-18T15:50:12.363-07:00Try again, but this time make a connection between...Try again, but this time make a connection between your statement and conclusion.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-83951761603190555042011-08-18T14:27:20.396-07:002011-08-18T14:27:20.396-07:00Clarence Thomas called a sexual harassment suit by...Clarence Thomas called a sexual harassment suit by a black woman a "high-tech lynching". Yes, I would say he supports a white supremacist agenda.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-30925672017906607232011-08-18T05:16:46.604-07:002011-08-18T05:16:46.604-07:00And in recent news, there's the Chicago firefi...And in recent news, there's the Chicago firefighter situation which shows how racist and destructive affirmative action is.<br /><br />African-Americans who are too incompetant to be firefighters are getting guaranteed jobs and/or cash rewards for being lousy firemen. Whites, hispanics, and others who are incompetant get what they should get: no money, and no firefighter jobs.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-13887864252880516772011-08-17T16:02:03.363-07:002011-08-17T16:02:03.363-07:00The above comment is yet another example of Claren...The above comment is yet another example of Clarence Thomas being bashed for his skin color. The racism if the left.<br /><br />"More specifically, because he's black and willing to support a white supremacist agenda."<br /><br />He has yet to support such an agenda in any way. Not only is the above commenter a raging bigot, he/she has no idea what he/she is talking about in regards to the subject mater.<br /><br />"Thomas is right: We don't need affirmative action."<br /><br />Well, now, this is true. Thomas is right. We don't need affirmative action. It is very racist. We need equal justice under the law.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29769707.post-79944555423714915162011-08-17T13:30:47.439-07:002011-08-17T13:30:47.439-07:00Isn't Athabascan a language family?
This is n...Isn't Athabascan a language family?<br /><br />This is nothing new. Clarence Thomas essentially culled his dissenting opinion in a court decision favoring affirmative action from his own psyche, with exactly zero footnotes. He knows he's only there because he's black. More specifically, because he's black and willing to support a white supremacist agenda.<br /><br />Thomas is right: We don't need affirmative action. We need whatever he and Yale legacy George W. Bush have.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com