March 07, 2009

Indians in Adaptation

Adaptation (Superbit Collection) (2003)Twisty brilliance from screenwriter Charlie Kaufman and director Spike Jonze, the team who created Being John Malkovich. Nicolas Cage returns to form with a funny, sad, and sneaky performance as Charlie Kaufman, a self-loathing screenwriter who has been hired to adapt Susan Orlean's book The Orchid Thief into a screenplay. Frustrated and infatuated by Orlean's elegant but plotless book (which is largely a rumination on flowers), Kaufman begins to write a screenplay about himself trying to write a screenplay about The Orchid Thief, all the while hounded by his twin brother Donald (Cage again), who's cheerfully writing the kind of formulaic action movie that Kaufman finds repugnant. By its conclusion, Adaptation is the most artistically ambitious, most utterly cynical, and most uncategorizable movie ever to come out of Hollywood. Also starring Meryl Streep (as Susan Orlean), Chris Cooper, Tilda Swinton, and Brian Cox; superb performances throughout. --Bret FetzerThe Native aspects of Adaptation:

AdaptationThe title "Adaptation" is a play on words. Kaufman is struggling to write an adaptation of Susan Orleans's "The Orchid Thief," while her book is--among other things--a study of how orchids have exemplified Darwinian adaptation. As a New Yorker writer, she decided to write her book after learning about the trial of John Laroche and three Seminole Indians in Florida. They had stolen orchids, a protected flora, from a swamp on the Seminole reservation. At his trial, Laroche claims that the Indians are exempt from such laws. In the film, Kaufman puts Orleans's story into the background and focuses on his own struggle to adapt such unwieldy material--at least to him--into a viable film. He depicts himself as an obsessed, neurotic failure, while Orleans (Meryl Streep) and Laroche (Chris Cooper) are transformed into fictional characters with only thin connections to the real people. Ultimately, this is not a film about Seminoles and orchids as much as it is about aesthetics.And:The one thing that Kaufman does not seem all that interested in is something that interests me a great deal, namely the troubled interconnections between American Indians, ecology, Darwinism and the flower market. If it was up to me, I would have made the three Indians who were caught with Laroche into the lead characters and put everybody else into the background, most of all Charlie Kaufman.Comment:  What do Jay Tavare, Litefoot, Roger Willie, and Gary Farmer have in common? Nothing, except they're Native actors who played Seminole Indians in Adaptation.

Tavare, Litefoot, and Willie are billed 5th through 7th on IMDB.com, while Farmer is billed 12th. But I must say I didn't remember the Indians in Adaptation. Apparently they didn't make much of an impression.

Like Being John Malkovich and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Adaptation is strange--unlike anything else in Hollywood--and brilliant. Not necessarily great, mind you, but brilliant. When I saw this movie, I thought it had to win the Oscar for Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay. (Alas, it was nominated but lost to The Pianist.)

Many critics have said the big blockbuster ending hurts Adaptation. I agree. I was going to give Adaptation a very high rating but the ending lowered it. Still, it's well worth seeing.

My ratings for the Charlie Kaufman movies I've seen:

Being John Malkovich--7.0
Adaptation--8.0
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind--8.0

For more on Adaptation, see the Wikipedia entry and Roger Ebert's review. For more on the subject in general, see The Best Indian Movies.

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:40 AM

    I very much wanted to see this movie on the big screen as a friend of mine saw it in Boston when it first opened, and strongly recommended that I see it.

    Sadly, the movie never came to Rapid City (South Dakota) at the time of its general release as I was told that a local coalition of evangelical Christians persuaded the theater chain's management not to show it as the movie (according to the Bible thumpers) promoted the theory of evolution in ways that the area's hick demographic would be highly susceptible to.

    This happened just a few years after there was a Christian-sponsored, Nazi-style "book burning" (to include not only books, but music cassettes, CDs, DVDs and videocassettes) that took place at a ranch near Spearfish, South Dakota, that was owned by some fundamentalist (who had acquired the ranch via ill-gotten monetary resources from when he had sold dope years earlier).

    I received confirmation about this book burning when I contacted my first ex-wife shortly after our divorce, and who had kept about $2000 worth of CDs and DVDs of mine. She told me that my "shit" was disposed of at the book burning.

    Interestingly enough, I also found out that when the Ku Klux Klan was at its heyday in the 1920s, the largest cross-burning in the Northern Plains took place near Spearfish. According to area old-timers, the sky was completely overcast that night, and the glow from the cross could be seen for miles around, even into Wyoming and North Dakota.

    South Dakota - "ya gotta love the place!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:18 AM

    What's wrong with killing animals for fun?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:26 AM

    Whoops wrong place (thanks to my insomnia).

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.