Mr. Bush is the triumph of the seemingly average American man. He’s normal. He thinks in a sort of common-sense way. He speaks the language of business and sports and politics. You know him. He’s not exotic. But if there’s a fire on the block, he’ll run out and help. He’ll help direct the rig to the right house and count the kids coming out and say, “Where’s Sally?” He’s responsible. He’s not an intellectual.
We could go on and on about the ways Bush is a "normal" American. He's a scion of white privilege--born on third base but thought he hit a triple. He's ignorant of foreigners and their beliefs and cultures. He believes God and the Bible are the fundamental source of wisdom. He thinks invading countries and killing people is the way to solve problems.
These qualities also describe the typical Euro-American who helped conquer the Indians. Which suggests why Bush couldn't define tribal sovereignty when asked. Like most Americans, he probably thinks Indians are a primitive people of the past.
For more on electing an "exotic" president, see Searching for a Native Obama and No Natives for President? For more on "normal" Americans, see A Shining City on a Hill: What Americans Believe and Adolf Hitler: A True American.
"He thinks invading countries and killing people is the way to solve problems"
ReplyDeleteYou could mean Bill Clinton. Or perhaps even Barack Obaaa (with the incursions into Pakistan earlier).
"It also explains how Obama got elected: by making himself seem as normal and unthreatening as the average white man."
ReplyDeleteThat's just your opinion; not a fact.
"And it explains why we may be decades away from electing a homosexual, a Muslim, or an Indian."
See above.
"Like most Americans, he probably thinks Indians are a primitive people of the past."
Prove that most Americans think that and btw thanks for revealing your anti-American bias once again.
Also your hitler piece simply isn't factual and it's an insult to Americans; if you want to draw a comparison between the holocaust and the Indian genocide a comparison to a president (ie Jackson) would be less offensive.
ReplyDelete"You could mean Bill Clinton. Or perhaps even Barack Obaaa (with the incursions into Pakistan earlier)."
ReplyDeleteExactly but Rob won't condemn them because they're democrats and in Rob's idiotic dualistic mindset he sees them as pure good.
"Obaaa" was a typo. But I hope ewe were able to figure that out on your own.
ReplyDeleteOf course, the invasion of Iraq was a little bit bigger. But it's not convenient for you to notice that.
ReplyDeleteI noticed it was a little bit bigger, but how is it relevant?
ReplyDelete