Debating Unbound Captives

Some comments on Preview of Unbound Captives and my responses:Writing an article based on rumor is a good way to further promote misinformation. The script is far different from the picture you are painting.Actually, most of the posting was my speculation, not an article "based on rumor(s)" I read elsewhere.

I searched for information on Unbound Captives but couldn't find any. Whose fault is it if the filmmakers can't or won't explain their movie satisfactorily? Are we supposed to avoid discussing it until they say it's okay?The script is far different from the picture you are painting. The story is mostly about the two characters portrayed by Hugh & Rachel. It's a love story set in the late 1850s to late 1860s. Hugh's character was also raised by the Comanche and still feels part Comanche in his heart.Featuring white characters in a Native-themed movie is part of the problem, not part of the solution. This is especially true if the white characters are supposed to be part Indian or raised by Indians. The use of "half-breeds" and "white Indians" lets the filmmakers pretend to do an Indian story while showcasing their white-as-a-vampire actors.

Here's an idea

Want to do a story about people held captive or raised by Comanches? Here's a radical thought: Use actual Comanches. Most have enough white blood that you can say they were raised by whites, were members of white society, were "torn between two worlds," etc. Showcase them rather than Australians and Brits feigning a Native upbringing.

If nothing else, you'll save a lot of money on salaries for Jackman, Wiesz, and Pattinson. If the investors and studios won't go for a movie without Jackman...well, it seems they're not going for Unbound Captives now. Try a different model than the star-centered vehicle that usually flops.The main Indian is based on a real person named Buffalo Hump.Buffalo Hump was a Comanche war chief while the Comanches held Cynthia Ann Parker. Both were characters in the TV version of Larry McMurtry's Comanche Moon.

I don't know if Buffalo Hump and Parker met, but they were active in the same time and place. There's still a good chance that Unbound Captives is partly based on Parker's story.You should try to contact Stowe to discuss your concerns and then write a follow-up. I think you'll have a different opinion once you get the facts.Sorry, but I don't have time to go through multiple layers of handlers to contact a celebrity. I'm the one who's making himself available here. Stowe can contact me if she wishes to correct my misapprehensions and promote her movie.

Making movies in the 21st century

Alas, Unbound Captives may not be going forward. As the commenters noted:Stowe has not even secured financing for this film yet.

Right now it doesn't look like it will happen till at least fall.Fortunately, that doesn't stop me from discussing it. <g>

If I were an investor, I'd be thinking: White people raised by Indians who don't fit into either world? Hmm, that's been done hundreds of times already in the long history of movies. How about if we try something new?

Maybe a Native-themed movie starring actual Indians? Wouldn't that appeal to America's increasingly multiracial and multicultural society? Yes, by Jove, I think it would!

For more on the subject, see Indians Hold Steady at 0.3% and Roscoe Pond or a Big-Name Actor?

Below:  Raised by a band of Comanches, he grew up wild as a wolverine! Only a woman's love could tame his savage breast!

A heartrending story as old as the 1910s but new for the 2010s! See Hugh Jackman and Robert Pattison as you've often seen them before...shirtless!

Preview of Unbound Captives

Unbound CaptivesUnbound Captives is an upcoming independent western film starring Robert Pattinson, Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz. The film is the directorial debut of Madeleine Stowe.

Plot

After his father is killed, a child is kidnapped at the age of four in 1859 with his sister and raised by the Comanche tribe. After being rescued by a frontiersman, their mother spends years searching for them and eventually finds them, but they do not remember her or anything about their previous life.

Production

The script was written by Stowe under the pseudonym O.C. Humphrey and her husband, Brian Benben in the early 1990s. The film never began production after Stowe declined a $5 million deal in 2003 because she wanted to star as the lead female role instead of only being the writer. Ridley Scott was originally intended to direct the film and star Russell Crowe as the role Hugh Jackman will play.Robert Pattinson Talks 'Breaking Dawn' & 'Unbound Captives'The young heartthrob revealed that it's tentatively scheduled to begin shooting in early 2010, and he sounds enthusiastic for a role that'll be miles away from Edward Cullen. "I'm playing a kid who is kidnapped by Comanches when he was four years old, and he is brought up by them. His mother spends her entire life trying to find me and my sister. When she finds us, we can't remember who she is and can't remember anything about the Western culture she grew up in. I speak Comanche the whole movie. You can't really speak more differently from Edward."Unbound Captives like a thinly veiled version of Cynthia Ann Parker's story:

The Story of Cynthia Ann ParkerThe Parker family, originally from Virginia, moved from Kentucky to Texas in the early 1830s and established Parker's Fort on the fringes of the Comanche frontier. On May 19, 1836, the Comanche and Kiowa attacked the fort killing most of the residents and capturing several women and children.

The captives were Mrs. Rachel Plummer, her fifteen-month-old son James, Mrs. Elizabeth Kellogg and the Parker children, Cynthia Ann, nine-years old and John, children of Silas Parker. The captives were scattered among the various bands of the two tribes. Later, the two women and the Plummer child were ransomed to friendly Indians and returned them to their families.

The Quohada band of Comanche who were the most war-like of all the Comanche bands took the two Parker children. In 1840, a trader named Col. Len Williams with another trader named Stoal and a Delaware Indian scout named Jack Henry came upon a Comanche camp on the Canadian River. They noticed a captive white girl and proposed a trade for her, which the Comanche flatly refused but gave Williams permission to speak to her.

The girl refused to speak to the trader either because she was afraid, had forgotten her mother tongue or did not care to talk. Williams believed that she was the Parker girl as she had blond hair and blue eyes and was about thirteen years old.

An interesting sidelight of this story is what became of Cynthia's younger brother John. John Parker adapted well to the wild Comanche life where one was free to roam the Llano Estacado from the Wichitas to Mexico. John became a Comanche through and through and went on many raids into Mexico. On one of these raids, John contracted smallpox. The Comanche so dreaded this disease that is set the entire band into a panic. The Comanche raiders abandoned John and left a Mexican captive girl to take care of him. John eventually recovered from the disease and returned to Mexico with the girl whom he later married.With Rachel Weisz (formerly Madelaine Stowe) in the Cynthia Ann Parker role, Robert Pattinson in the John Parker, and Hugh Jackman as the noble white man who tries to save them from the Indians.

This could be a good Native-themed movie or a bad one, but I'm already seeing a number of red flags:

It seems Unbound Captives will be the umpteenth example of seeing a Native culture through white eyes.

Madelaine Stowe is a first-time screenwriter who has no known Native expertise except appearing in The Deerslayer and The Last of the Mohicans.

Stowe and company are putting their money into star salaries rather than production. Outside of Wolverine and Twilight, Jackman and Pattinson are no guarantees of success.

IMDB.com doesn't list any Native roles or actors in the movie.

No one's talking about using Comanche cultural or language experts. Supposedly the film starts shooting in early 2010--i.e., any day now.

The Comanches sound like a bunch of murdering savages. There's no hint of their humanity.

Perhaps the only positive note is that the captives end up thinking of themselves as Comanche and wanting to stay. But the movie could spin that as a negative result of cult-like brainwashing. In a story like this, people "torn between two worlds" usually die tragically. They rarely go on to live happily ever after.

For more on the subject, see The Best Indian Movies.

Below:  The stars...



...and someone who looks like a hardened Western woman (Cynthia Ann Parker) rather than a pampered actress.