In the twisted right-wing version of history, whites are bias victims. Meanwhile, the poor get stiffed.
By Jeffrey O.G. Ogbar
Many whites believe that blacks are hired and promoted and get home loans easier than whites because of "racial preferences." Some even argue that the criminal justice system is soft on black people. One white nationalist website complains that because of the civil rights movement, "all [black criminals] have to worry about is a slap on the wrist from a judicial system that couldn't care less about White victims."
What is remarkable about these "facts" is how far they are from the truth. Studies find that with identical résumés, those with "white sounding" names have a 50 percent higher response rate from prospective employees than do those with "black sounding" names. Whites on average outearn Latinos and blacks, with or without controlling for education.
Since the Great Recession, average white net wealth has increased to 18 times that of Latinos and 20 times that of African Americans. The Latino unemployment rate is about 40 percent that of whites, while the African-American rate is 100 percent higher. Whites and blacks consume illegal drugs at similar rates, but whites are less likely than blacks to be stopped by the police, arrested or convicted--or to receive prison time once convicted--even for first-time offenders of the same crime.
Below: Something teabaggers don't mention when they talk about returning to the past. I wonder why not?
1 comment:
Part of the blame is from the fact that quota-based affirmative action demand such discrimination against whites.
Then you end up with situations like in Chicago where a bunch of incompetent applicants didn't make the cut to be firefighters. In a crazy court ruling, the sub-par black applicants get massive cash rewards and/or jobs. Just for not being up to snuff. The white applicants who also were to lousy to be firefighters get.... nothing. That's more racism.
"Many whites believe that blacks are hired and promoted and get home loans easier than whites because of "racial preferences"
Again, this is because affirmative action policies demand this.
"Studies find that with identical résumés, those with "white sounding" names have a 50 percent higher response rate from prospective employees than..."
Yes, of course. There is no excuse for this either. Just as there is no excuse for the prevalent racism of "preferences". Why allow any of it?
Post a Comment