The council considers the show disrespectful to human bodies. Native Americans have been among the strongest opponents of the show..
The Gila River resolution, adopted in February on a 14-0 vote, said visitation by the community's children "will cause spiritual harm in many untold ways."
4 comments:
Interesting article, Rob. My daughter's bio class was encouraged to see the same exhibit here in Michigan. Personally, I was squeamish since displaying these very real bodies does seem disrespectful. I'm surprised their hasn't been more push-back against this exhibit.
I very briefly discussed seeing this during a visit to yet another state where it is on display.
For one thing, count me among the squeamish. For another, I've heard that the bodies are from Chinese political prisoners. I do not know if it is true. For another, it is expensive: more than $20.
We're more squeamish about in-the-flesh bodies, which seem new, than skeletons, which seem old. But the distinction is an arbitrary one.
By "arbitrary," I meant there's no clearcut line between a body covered with flesh, a body with some flesh and some bones, and a skeleton. There's no physical line and there's definitely no moral line. Our society has arbitrarily decided that bones are okay but flesh isn't.
If you still don't understand what "arbitrary" means, look it up. As with "decimate" and "semantics," I've used the word correctly whether you get it or not.
Post a Comment