[T]he most obnoxious aspect to this film is self-proclaimed Indian activist Russell Means, who sneers at how Hollywood continues to perpetrate negative imagery of the American Indian. Never mind that he’s profited from appearing in several Hollywood films. Means then insinuates he was personally thrilled to see the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11. If Means can coherently explain how the thousands killed on 9/11 were responsible for the state of Pine Ridge today, I would love to hear it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab754/ab7543fb7a92a1f47a1bdde47a89d2b725ee55b4" alt=""
3 comments:
Maybe Means adopts the Ward Churchill perspective...those that dies in the World Trade Centre on 9/11 we're like 'little Eichmans' because they never questioned thier governments oppressive and exploitative ways, indeed, they profited from them. Or maybe Means has an all together different interpretation, I don't know.
By the way, thanks for blogging about this stuff. Personally, I think how people see themselves portrayed in the media informs their actions (and of course others perceptions) in the real world. Positive recognition is key!
You're welcome, Hayden. When you say "how people see themselves portrayed in the media informs their actions," I agree completely.
P.S. I'm gonna take a wild guess and say you're not Tom Hayden, Jane Fonda's ex.
Ha ha. Sorry to disapoint writerfella, Rob's right, I am not Tom Hayden, nor have I ever met Jane Fonda.
Post a Comment