May 11, 2009

Indians doomed to die out?

Two unsettling articles address the issue of what it means to be an Indian. And what will happen as Indians inevitably intermarry and their "blood quantum" diminishes.

As Requirements Change, Just Who Is An Indian?

By Brian BullLeeam's soft brown eyes open for a moment, then he's back to sleep as Poulin's mom, Amber Malone, looks on. She wants Leeam to learn all about her tribe, the Prairie Band of Potawatomi. Only technically he's not actually a member. Most tribes, including the Potawatomi, require at least one-quarter tribal blood to become official—complete with enrollment card and number. Malone says she's worried how enrolled members will treat her grandson—who doesn't have that one-quarter tribal blood—as he grows up.

"I know of people that have asked for proof," Malone says. "If you don't have proof, then you're not an Indian. In the native culture, some people treat them as substandard individuals. As wannabes."

Malone says there's talk among the Potawatomi of lowering the requirement to one-eighth. That—in a stroke of a pen—could double the tribe's membership, but there's a lot at stake here. Enrolled members enjoy tribal benefits, including health care and education, and there are science and art programs, too.
'Status Indians' face threat of extinction

In some communities, last children with historic rights will be born as early as 2012

By Nicholas Keung
They've survived decimation by disease and discrimination, but now Canada's native people are facing what Beaver calls "a legislated extinction of status Indians."

Statistics that show the self-identified aboriginal population is growing fast--a 45 per cent jump over 10 years to 1.2 million--can be deceiving, said Beaver. Under Canadian law, those who "count" are "status Indians"--a group strictly defined by the Indian Act.

Many First Nations communities will die out within a few generations, in terms of registered Indians. That's because the "two-generation cut-off" created when the Indian Act was revised in 1985 stipulates only children born of two Indian status parents inherit status. Because of intermarriage, some communities will see their last status Indian born as soon as 2012.
Comment:  For more on the subject, see:

Rob shouldn't judge Natives?
Determining Indians = waste of time?
Rob doesn't understand "mutts"?
"Actual Indian" defined
The genetics of being Indian
Educating Russ about who's an Indian
Are you a reeeeeeal "part" Injun?

2 comments:

Unknown said...

I'm at the cut off point for my tribe.
Well, actually most people my age are at the cut off point.
It's sad to think that because of these standards my children, if I do not have children with a native, will not get the same benefits and/or will not even be considered part of my tribe.

Anonymous said...

Tough shit.

I myself am a halfbreed (no, not some metis descended from a halfbreed. A real one) and if I don't have kids with another status Indian, my kids won't have status. Tough. They won't be Native anyways.

What's the solution?

Stop having kids with non-natives. Preserve our genetic ID.

Of course, this is probably hard to do, as few Natives prosper on the rez and usually immigrate to the cities, where the inevitable assimilation occurs.

Almost makes me want to go and make friends with some Indian-struck Europeans with big money, and convince them to help fund a Native-sperm and egg bank, as scary as the eugenic theme gets there.