Tancredo Confuses Mottos, Logos, And Much, Much More
It's a line that appears in a '60s era manifesto called El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán, which was influential to members of a separate group called MEChA (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán). Several decades ago, MEChA was a fairly radical student organization, whose mission was to return the lands of the southwest United States to Mexico--an idea called "reconquista." Since then it has become, basically, the equivalent of a Mexican Students Association at most colleges across the country.]
Commentary: Judge Sotomayor is not a racist
The offending section of the speech is this: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." This passage inspired Gingrich, former speaker of the House of Representatives and potential 2012 presidential candidate, to call Judge Sotomayor "a Latina racist."
To lift one statement out of Judge Sotomayor's eight-page speech without examining the context and substance of her remarks, is an example of the kind of shoddy character assassination that I suspect will dominate this judicial confirmation process.
Judge Sotomayor's speech is, in fact, an excellent meditation on how the experiences of judges might affect how they approach aspects of judicial decision-making. It explores the important, and too-little examined reality that judicial deliberations can be affected by a judge's background, perspective and experience.
For evidence, look no further than all the 5-4 Supreme Court decisions that split along ideological lines. If beliefs didn't influence decisions, there would be no left-right splits.
For more on the subject, see The Search for Aztlán and Antonin Scalia: Supreme Court Doofus.
4 comments:
"As with the lily-white tea parties that compared Obama to Hitler"
It was a silly comparison but it was not racist. Also what does skin color have to do with this? Oh yeah that's right NOTHING.
"stereotyped Indians"
They didn't all do that, you're simply using an idiotic guilt by association argument.
"conservatives are proving their racism once again"
The article below describes a misunderstanding not racism; once again you label anything you dislike 'racist' (I'd say the word ignorant applies to this scenario) it's juvenile and just plain silly. You on the other hand have demonstrated sexism by using the word 'bitch', so like I post if you want to lead a crusade against prejudice start with yourself. And it's not as if leftists haven't been guilty of racism either; for example various leftists have insulted Cuban-Americans.
Rob has made this mistake before. Equating Obama to Hitler is a ridiculous "Godwin's Law" invocation, exactly as the equating of Bush with Hitler. And both comparisons are equally entirely free of racism.
The article below describes a misunderstanding not racismHa ha ha. Oh yep sure.
Thanks for demonstrating that sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. ;)
Post a Comment