Now that I've finally stopped laughing, I can post a reply. Hey redskin...do you live on Redskin Road in Redskin City? In a little red-brick house? With Little Red Riding Hood, perhaps?
Is your neighboring town called Yellowface City, Greenhair City, or Bluefoot City? Is your country called Oz or Neverland or Narnia, perhaps? Or are you imagining all these streets and cities named "redskin" in a colorful daydream, somewhere over the rainbow, in a nice padded room?
Ahem. Moving on...here's the latest semi-coherent nonsense from our "yellow" red man:
You claimed "redskin" is used all over the continent. The only example you gave was a Redskin hose, which has no connection to the Native ethnic slur. In other words, you made a ridiculous claim and I challenged you on it. Not surprisingly, you couldn't back up your claim with anything resembling a fact.
Anonymous unclear on the issue
Accept that your people label yourself with the pejorative word "redskin," a different matter? No, I don't accept that. Go ahead and prove it, or admit you can't.
Duh.
I've explained several times that "red" isn't the same as "redskin." If you were too dense to get the point before, maybe you'll get it now.
Similarly, "bitch," "cock," and many other words can be innocent or insulting in different contexts. Let's hope you're not as clueless as you seem about how language works.
Try to get this through your thick skull, genius. I'm not protesting the Native use of the word "red." I frequently post items with the word "red" in them--for instance, Arigon Starr in Red Ink. I don't criticize the use of "red" because Natives don't criticize it.
What I'm criticizing is the specific combination of seven letters known as "redskin." I'm doing this not because I have strong feelings about the word, but because many Natives consider it an ethnic slur. I'm not telling them what to think, I'm telling you what they think.
Natives love Redskin magazine?
If you're unwilling to do this test, then you're implicitly admitting I'm right. So go ahead and do it. Prove to us that you're not yellow, red man.
As for "pushing" the issue, you don't know much about marketing if you trust people's reactions when you thrust the magazine in their faces. The better question is how many issues you've sold. In fact, where is the magazine being distributed for sale? I haven't seen or heard of it anywhere except in these postings, which tells me it isn't reaching the masses.
You "think alot"? I guess your brain isn't connected to your fingers, because your so-called thinking isn't evident in your writing.
Let's compare your magazine to my website. BlueCornComics.com has been online more than 10 years. In 2008 it received 4,312,559 pageviews. That's an average of 11,815 pageviews per day.
Meanwhile, your magazine is what...a year old? While Blue Corn Comics was entertaining and informing readers in 2008, how many issues did you sell? Have you reached four digits yet?
If you've managed to gain even 4,313 readers--which is one-thousandth of the number of readers I got last year--I'll be impressed. So tell us your sales figures and prove how popular you are, mouth. Put up or shut up.
In short, it's easy to talk the talk--to boast about your little publication. But I've been publishing my views 10 times longer than you have. Until you've proved your staying power, color me unimpressed with your startup efforts.
Origin of white people?
Here's one claim for how Indians came to be known as "red" people.
Beothuks: The Red People of Canada
The Beothuks were a native people who lived in Newfoundland. They loved to use a red ochre paint all over themselves. It was this red which made such an impression on the explorers. The name "red Indian" carried over to refer to all other First Nations.
Are you claiming your description of white people as explorers is also pre-contact? That the "red" people not only knew about white people but knew they were exploring the whole world?
If so, I'm guessing you're wrong. I'd say this story is almost certainly post-contact.
Anyway, I'm glad you approve of white people like me asking why. Therefore, I'll continue to ask why you've titled your magazine with an ethnic slur. Why?
Below: A resident of Redskin Road in Redskin City.
"me rite like this .. with funny dots .. because me am primitive redskin. Brave and squaw in teepee .. no teach good English .. like smart white man. Too busy count wampum .. smoke peace pipe .. pray to Great Spirit. Me very angry .. can't rite good .. me so ignorant."
6 comments:
"the white people were giving a sense of exploration .. to ask why?"
The real reason the Norse became explorers, raiders, traders etc. is because they lived in miserable conditions; however they managed to build a rich culture and make vast achievements(contrary to popular stereotype there was more to the norse than swarthy barbarians). of course the urge to explore is universal (ie nomadic native tribes) but romanticism had next to nothing to do with Norse exploration. So this guy is history; the real reason the Norse spouting a romanticized version of launched ships wasn't out of a 'sense of exploration' but simply to build better lives for themselves (and to raid).
Rob, you have to speak the language of the flame. The flamer does not listen to reason. He listens to:
1 Insults
2 Fads like "C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!" and "/10" (as in "spam/10")
3 Caption insults
4 Theories about how anyone who disagrees with you is part of a larger conspiracy
5 Threats to sue people who disagree with you for libel
6 Various permutations of 4 and 5
7 The word 'pwn', as in "u r so pwned"
8 Sexual orientation insults, e.g. "j00 = ph@g!+"
9 Name corruptions, particularly sex changes and diminutives
10 Anything written in ALL CAPS, small capitals, aLtErNaTiNg CaPiTaLs, or l33t because that's k3wl
11 Excessive cross-posting
12 Signing your opponent up for spam, particularly bestiality porn
When you understand this about flamers, you can better communicate with them in their native language.
I can't recall seeing anything depicting the Norse as "Swarthy".
Rob: Dealing with guys like that is like shooting fish in a barrel. You have to wonder why they sometimes so willingly jump into the barrel.
I'm referring to the 'evil horned helmet barbarian' stereotype (ie that terrible movie pathfinder) when in fact there was far more to Norse culture than swinging a battle axe.
Look up the word "Swarthy": "dark-skinned: naturally having skin of a dark color"
Maybe I'm wrong, but I've never thought of Nordic types as naturally dark-skinned.
Heh sorry for some reason I thought it meant filthy (that's what I get for posting while sleep deprived).
Post a Comment